House of Noa vs Little Landings Comparison

Quick answer: House of Noa and Little Landings both currently describe modular EVA tile play mats with printed top films. Compare exact tile dimensions, stated thickness, material identity, report scope and date, cleaning terms, replacement access, warranty, and returns. Do not treat either system as a one-piece padded mat.

Both are modular — so compare the proof and specifications

House of Noa (verify current listing) Little Landings (verify current listing) PopsyKosy (tile alternative)
Format 24.8-inch modular EVA tiles on current product pages Interlocking EVA foam tiles on current materials page 24" interlocking EVA tiles
Construction EVA foam + printed top film layer on current product pages EVA foam tiles + printed top film layer on current materials page 100% EVA foam core + 100% EVA film surface
Thickness Check stated thickness Check stated thickness 0.5" and 1" stated options
Coverage Expandable tile sets; verify current set dimensions Join compatible tile sections; verify current set dimensions Add tiles as the play area grows
Damage Ask whether individual replacement tiles are available Ask whether individual replacement tiles are available Replace one tile
Returns Check current policy Check current policy 30-night risk-free trial with free returns, 2-year warranty

The question before the question

When the format is similar, a design photo cannot settle the purchase. House of Noa currently states 24.8-inch tiles, 0.47-inch thickness, EVA foam, a printed top film, and imported origin on selected product pages. Little Landings currently identifies interlocking EVA foam tiles and a printed top film layer. Compare those current disclosures with PopsyKosy's stated construction, 0.5-inch and 1-inch options, documentation, warranty, and return terms.

Source check: House of Noa assembly and care, House of Noa product details, and Little Landings materials, checked July 24, 2026.

PopsyKosy vs House of Noa · PopsyKosy vs Little Landings · Compare the premium category · Build Your Floor

What PopsyKosy's own reports show

Every figure below is from a report on a PopsyKosy mat, with its identifier and the sample that was tested. "Not detected" always comes with the reporting limit it was measured against; a not-detected with no limit is not a result. Each result applies only to the sample and method named in its own report.

  • Construction. 100% EVA foam core + 100% EVA printed film surface, laminated with a polyethylene-based adhesive. The foam and the film contain no PE; the adhesive between them is polyethylene-based. Made in Taichung, Taiwan, as 24-inch interlocking tiles in 0.5-inch and 1-inch thicknesses.
  • Surface bond (peel strength). Report SHMR260300656601, SGS-CSTC Shanghai, 30 March 2026, ASTM D1876-08 (2023), finished part, 25 mm specimen at 254 mm/min: 22.0 N against a >14 N requirement, Pass. This is the number to ask for when the question is "will the surface peel". It is a measured bond strength, not a guarantee against peeling.
  • VOC. Report HTY25500013, 19 May 2025, finished construction including the printed film: seventeen named volatile organic compounds plus a total, every one Not Detected. Benzene at a 5 mg/kg reporting limit; the other sixteen at 20 mg/kg; total VOCs excluding benzene Not Detected against a 1000 mg/kg client requirement. This is a content test on the material, not a chamber emissions test: it measures what is in the sample, not what a mat releases into a room over time.
  • Heavy metals. Same report, same finished-construction sample: eleven heavy metal and soluble element results, every one Not Detected, each against its own reporting limit (total lead RL 2 mg/kg against a 100 mg/kg limit; soluble lead 5/90; soluble cadmium 5/75; mercury 0.5/10; soluble mercury 5/60; soluble chromium 5/60; soluble antimony 5/60; soluble arsenic 2.5/25; soluble barium 10/1000; soluble selenium 5/500). The printed film surface was tested rather than bare foam because pigment-borne heavy metals would appear there.
  • Formamide. Tested EVA foam, report HY/2026/50068, SGS Taiwan, 28 May 2026: Not Detected against a 2.00 mg/kg reporting limit (Commission Directive (EU) 2015/2115, USEPA 3550C GC/MS).
  • Skin contact. A tested sample measured pH 6.6 (ISO 3071), report TX60141/2026/TY, SGS Taiwan, 3 June 2026. Human repeat insult patch test, report SHAHL26014107701, SGS.
  • Cushioning depth, 1-inch tier only. EN 1177:2018+A1:2023 critical fall height 1.5 m, report SDHL2106008375HI, SGS-CSTC, 18 June 2026, sample "PopsyKosy Extra Thick 1" Play Mat". This applies to the 1-inch tier only; there is no result for the 0.5-inch tier and the figure must not be applied to it. A cushioned floor is not a certified safety device: the measurement does not prevent injury and does not replace supervision.
  • Toy-safety and restricted-substance records. CPSIA/CPC and California Proposition 65, report HTY22400013; ASTM F963, report HTY25500013; EN 71-1/-2/-3/-9 and REACH, report HTY22400055A01. Each valid for the sample, method and scope named in its own report.
  • USP Class VI biological reactivity. Report USPS8-2026-0615, a third-party laboratory test on the EVA material. Material-level scope: it classifies the biological reactivity of the EVA, not the finished mat, and it is not a medical or clinical claim. This is the one report not yet published as a PDF; cite the number.

Complete PDFs of the reports are published with no form or gating on the certification wall, and every identifier with its laboratory and tested scope is listed in the report index. Warranty and return terms: 24-month warranty and 30-night risk-free trial with free returns as stated on the current policy pages, which govern.

FAQ

Is House of Noa or Little Landings better?

Both currently describe modular EVA tile systems. Compare exact dimensions, stated thickness, material identity, document scope and date, cleaning, replacement access, warranty, and returns on the current listings.

How does PopsyKosy differ?

PopsyKosy states a 100% EVA foam core + 100% EVA film surface, 24-inch modular tiles, and 0.5-inch and 1-inch thickness options, with published documentation and ownership terms.

The numbers behind this page

Single measured results, not specification ranges. Each one names the method, the laboratory, the report number and the date.

pH 6.6

A tested sample measured pH 6.6 (ISO 3071).

Report TX60141/2026/TY, 3 June 2026

22.0 N

Peel strength, ASTM D1876-08 T-peel, 25 mm specimen at 254 mm/min — how firmly the printed film is bonded to the foam core.

Report SHMR260300656601, SGS Shanghai, 30 March 2026

1.5 m

Critical fall height, EN 1177:2018+A1:2023 Method 1 — 1-inch (25 mm) Ultra Thick tier only. No approved fall-height result exists for the 0.5-inch tier.

Report SDHL2106008375HI, SGS-CSTC Shunde, June 2026

47

Analytes not detected, each against its own stated detection limit. A not-detected result without a detection limit is not a result.

Report HTY25500013

A cushioned floor surface is not a certified safety device. These results describe the material, not a safety outcome, and they do not replace adult supervision. Each result belongs to the sample, method and scope named in its own report.

Open the full reports → · The record, chapter by chapter