Vintage Floral
Persian Garden
Firework
Boho
Little Builders
Boulder
Tranquil Flower
Totem
PopsyKosy vs Parklon: Material, Documents and Warranty Compared
Short version: Parklon and PopsyKosy are not the same kind of product. Parklon's own site says its mats are made of PVC or PE. Ours are EVA foam with an EVA print film. That is a material choice, not a verdict — but it is the first thing worth knowing, and Parklon states it plainly, which we credit them for.
Side by side — checked 19 September 2026
| PopsyKosy | Parklon | |
|---|---|---|
| Material, as stated | EVA foam, EVA print film | “nontoxic, non-phthalate PVC or PE… BPA-free” |
| Lab report numbers | 8, all published | None. “SGS” is named; no report is cited |
| Full PDFs you can open | All 8 | Not published |
| Formamide result | Numeric, with method and detection limit | Not published |
| Fall height | EN 1177:2018+A1:2023 Method 1, tested June 2026 on the 1″ mat | Not published |
| Peel strength | 22.0 N (ASTM D1876-08, 25 mm specimen, 254 mm/min) | Not published |
| Warranty | 24 months | No warranty stated |
| Lifespan language | We publish peel strength instead of a lifespan estimate | “can be expected to last up to 5 years” |
Parklon figures read from parklonamerica.com/pages/about-us on 19 September 2026.
The one line worth pausing on
“Can be expected to last up to 5 years” is a durability estimate, and it sits on a page with no warranty. A five-year expectation with no warranty behind it costs the seller nothing if the mat does not last five years. We would rather put the number where it can be checked — a measured peel strength — and then stand behind the mat for 24 months in writing.
PVC and EVA are different questions
We are not going to tell you PVC is unsafe; that depends entirely on formulation and on what a given mat was actually tested for, and we have not tested theirs. What we will say is narrower and checkable: a buyer comparing the two has a published, dated, numbered chemical panel on our side and, as of 19 September 2026, no report number at all on theirs. Parklon may well hold good data. It is simply not on the page.
What we do not claim
- We have not tested this brand's mat. Nothing here is a statement about how their product performs.
- Every cell about them is what their own public pages said on 19 September 2026, linked above.
- “Not published” means we could not find it that day. A brand may hold data it chooses not to publish.
- If we have this wrong, tell us and we will correct it — and we will date the correction.
Check our side yourself
Eight full reports, every one a complete PDF with the lab, the method and the detection limits on it — not a badge, not a summary.
Competitor information verified 19 September 2026 from the sources linked on this page. PopsyKosy figures: SGS-CSTC Shunde SDHL2106008375HI (EN 1177:2018+A1:2023 Method 1, June 2026), SGS Shanghai SHMR260300656601 (ASTM D1876-08 T-peel, 30 March 2026), HY/2026/50068 (formamide), HTY25500013 (chemical panel).
